HOME | SITE BACKGROUND | BOTANY TRANSFORMATION PROJECTS | COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT | CONTACT US

Project Home Page

Background
History
Project Overview

NCUA & Orica's Response

Strategy Review 07-08


Cleaning Up the Groundwater

Groundwater Treatment Plant (GTP)

Backup System

Hydraulic Containment

Contaminant (DNAPL) Investigations


Community Matters

Calendar
Community Liaison Committee (CLC)

CLC Meeting Documents
Outreach Programs
Residential Bore Monitoring

Rainwater Tank Rebate
Community Air Monitoring
Community Workshops

 

Independent Monitoring Committee

Introduction
Members
Activities

Reports

 

Publications

CLC Newsletters updated
Fact Sheets

Reports

Progress Reports

Archive

Independent Validation Audit
Environmental Monitoring

Ecological Monitoring

Community Air Monitoring

Site Air Emission Sampling 

Settlement Monitoring

Other Monitoring
Human Health Risk Assessment

Further Groundwater Investigations

Conceptual Site Model

DNAPL Investigations

Extremities Investigations
Bioremediation Research

GTP Environmental Impact Statement

Groundwater Cleanup Plan & NCUA

 

Generic Public Documents

SH&E Management Plan

Independent Monitoring Committee (IMC) Reports

The IMC has prepared reports or provided verbal feedback on the following topics:

 

Download Reports

Review Risk Assessment Conducted for Mercury Contamination Associated with Former ChlorAlkali Plant

Review the Human Health & Environmental Risk Assessment (HHERA) conducted for the soil and groundwater mercury contamination associated with the former ChlorAlkali plant (FCAP) operation

Orica proposes to remediate the soil mercury contamination associated with the FCAP in winter 2010. The Community Liaison Committee asked for a review of the HHERA conducted in 2008, which fed into the soil remediation plans.

 

(N.B. - This task was beyond the scope of IMC)

Date 10 June 2010
Author Prof Priestly
Report
Report pdficon_small.gif 
247 KB

 

Potential Health Risks Associated with DEAC Waste Treatment

Review DEAC Waste Treatment at GTP by Orica in Nov 08 and Assess Any Human Health Risks

Orica advised the Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) of the intention to treat diethyl aluminium chloride (DEAC) waste at the GTP in October 2008. DECC approved treatment of the waste subject to conditions. The community was informed of the waste activity whilst it was underway in November. Orica received strong feedback from some CLC members who were angry that they had not been advised of the waste treatment in advance. This matter was raised again at the June 2009 CLC meeting with some CLC members concerned that the waste treatment may have caused harm to people living and working in the area. It was agreed at the June 2009 CLC meeting that Prof Priestly be asked to review the information surrounding treatment of the waste and provide comment back to the CLC in response to the concerns raised.

Date

7/9/09

Author

Prof Priestly 

Report

Report pdficon_small.gif

127 KB

 

Evaluation of Current Monitoring Programs Conducted at the GTP

Evaluate monitorings conducted at the GTP

 Following on request to evaluate existing monitoring programs conducted by Orica to date (Task 15), Dr McCracken recommended to conduct an analysis of inputs and outputs from the GTP by looking at other monitorings conducted by Orica under its Environment Protection Licence, Trade Waste Service Agrrement and Ammonia Pollution Reduction Program for the GTP to provide any recommendations for further monitorings.

Date

26/2/08

Author

Dr McCraken

Report

Progress report pdficon_small.gif

265 KB

 

Review of Dr McCraken's Review of Monitorings Conducted at the GTP

 The Community Liaison Committee asked the Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) to review recommendations given by Dr McCracken on his progress report on the evaluation of current monitoring programs at the GTP (Dr McCracken's report is available in the box below)

Date

12/9/08

Author

DECC

Letter

DECC response pdficon_small.gif

1.1 MB

 

Orica's Response to DECC's Recommendations Based on Dr McCracken's Review & Reply from DECC on the Scans Conducted

   Following DECC's review of Dr McCracken recommendations, the DECC requested Orica to conduct analysis on semi-volatile compounds (SVOCs) in groundwater feed to the GTP and treated water discharged to Perry Street Canal. Orica conducted analysis in late 2008, which showed that while low concentrations of SVOCs are present in the feedwater to the GTP, there were no detections above the relevant ANZECC Trigger Values in treated water discharged from the GTP.

 

   DECC provided its response acknowledging the work. Following these correspondences, the Community Liaison Committee was satisfied with the works conducted and requested no further action on the matter.

Date

9/4/09 & 28/4/09 (respectively)

Authors

Orica & DECC (respectively)

Letter

Report on SVOCs scans & DECC response pdficon_small.gif

453 KB

 

Potential Health Risks Associated with Washing Fish at Penrhyn Estuary

Advise on any potential health risks associated with washing fish at Penrhyn Estuary

 Community members have frequently seen anglers washing their catch at Penrhyn Estuary despite warning signs about water contamination in the area and potential risks of wading in the water.

Date

26/10/07

Authors

Prof Priestly

Report

Report pdficon_small.gif

78 KB

 

Comment on Orica Groundwater Injection & Recovery System (GIRS)Proposal

Comment in principle on Orica Groundwater Injection & Recovery (GIRS) proposal 

 GIRS is a proposed contingency plan for back-up hydraulic containment during the unlikely event of a long-term shutdown of the Groundwater Treatment Plant. It would involve groundwater from the Secondary Containment Area at Foreshore Road being extracted and reinjected at the Botany Industrial Park. For further details, refer to Orica presentation to Community Liaison Committee (CLC) given on 18 September 2007.

Date

26/10/07

Authors

Prof Acworth

Feedback

Prof Acworth provided a verbal feedback at the October 2007 combined CLC & IMC meeting. He advised that he does not see any hydrological problem with the GIRS proposal. He said that the proposal makes practical sense and indicated that the community should not be concerned by the reinjection of contaminated groundwater at the BIP. He expressed caution that reinjection may be compromised after periods of prolonged heavy rainfall when aquifer recharge is high as the higher water table would reduce the effective storage capacity of the aquifer.

 

Evaluation of Existing Monitoring Programs

Advise on current air and groundwater monitoring programs:

  Comment if, in their opinion and in accordance to their area of expertise, there are any aspects of the existing air and water monitoring programs reported in the quarterly Orica Progress Report that are not needed, or if there is any additional monitoring that would be beneficial going forward.

Date

Sep - Oct 07

Authors

Dr Clunies-Ross, Dr Hibberd and Prof Acworth 

Feedback

Dr Mark Hibberd's feedback on dioxin monitoring pdficon_small.gif

28 KB

Dr Clunies-Ross feedback:
  Dioxin monitoring & Thermal Oxidiser reduced temperature trial pdficon_small.gif (26/9/07) 75 KB
Dioxin monitoring pdficon_small.gif (7/9/07) 80 KB
Prof Acworth provided a verbal feedback, which was noted at a CLC meeting held on 18 September 2007:
 

As previously raised, Prof Acworth has two concerns regarding existing groundwater monitoring programs. They are:

  • The need for better groundwater level data at the north of the groundwater model area; and,
  • The need for additional chemical data south (downgradient) of the Secondary Containment Area.

Prof Acworth noted that additional data loggers have been installed in response to the first point (but that the data is not yet available) and that Orica is considering the potential for capturing more data south of the SCA in response to his second point. Prof Acworth had asked the CLC to be advised that he has no further comment on the adequacy of monitoring until feedback on these matters is received.

Prof Priestly provided a verbal feedback at the October 2007 combined CLC & IMC meeting and explained that, in his opinion, there is no need to extend any human health risk assessment monitoring for the Botany Groundwater Cleanup Project.

 

 Investigating Dioxin Formation at the GTP

Dioxin formation investigation

  (For details, refer to the scoping paper on table below)

Date

2007 & 2008

Authors

Dr Hibberd and Dr Clunies-Ross

Reports

Final Report pdficon_small.gif (19/5/08)

96 KB

Progress update  pdficon_small.gif (7/9/07)

80 KB

 

Examining benefits and costs of developing a research project on dioxin formation at the GTP:

  Established scope, costs and benefits of a project to investigate the formation of dioxin at the GTP for review by CLC

Date

12/06/07

Authors

Dr Clunies-Ross and Dr Hibberd 

Report

Scope paper on a dioxin formation research project pdficon_small.gif

25 KB

 

Groundwater Monitoring South of the Secondary Containment Area (SCA)

Discussion regarding groundwater monitoring south of the SCA:

  A meeting record between Orica, CLC representative, Orica's consultant, NSW DECC and Prof Ian Acworth to discuss additional groundwater monitoring south of the SCA with points and actions agreed for review by the CLC

Date

18/07/07

Author

Orica

Report

Summary report on discussion pdficon_small.gif

20 KB

 

Expert Views on Orica's Progress & Matters that Need to be Further Addressed

Views on Progress & Further Matters to be Addressed to Orica:

  Provide individual insights and comments on the progress of the Groundwater Cleanup Project to date, and advise on specific questions that the member thinks the community should be asking Orica

Date

Apr - May 07

Authors

Prof Acworth, Dr McCracken, Prof Priestly, Dr Hibberd and Dr Clunies-Ross

Paper 

Prof Ian Acworth's comments and questions pdficon_small.gif

297KB

Dr John McCracken's comments and questions pdficon_small.gif 81KB 
Prof Brian Priestly's comments and questions pdficon_small.gif 113KB
Dr Mark Hibberd's comments and questions pdficon_small.gif 35KB 
Dr Chris Clunies-Ross' comments and questions pdficon_small.gif 25KB 

 

A Review - Effects of Historical Groundwater Abstraction

Impacts of Historical Groundwater Abstraction:
  A brief summary of a review on the impacts of large-scale groundwater extraction over the last 50 years in the Botany Sands Aquifer

Date

28/8/06

Author

Prof Acworth

Summary

Review on Effects of Groundwater Abstraction in Botany pdficon_small.gif

87KB

Botany Aquifer Levels in 1942 pdficon_small.gif

77KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1969 pdficon_small.gif 76KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1979 pdficon_small.gif 74KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1986 pdficon_small.gif 69KB

 

Groundwater Modelling / Monitoring and Saline Intrusion  

A Response to Groundwater Modelling / Monitoring and Saline Intrusion Tasks by Prof Acworth

Date

3/11/06

Author

Orica

Reports

Main report pdficon_small.gif

1.2MB

Hydraulic containment explanation pdficon_small.gif

43KB

Saline Intrusion explanation pdficon_small.gif

58KB

Map showing Orica's groundwater and ecological monitoring locations south of the secondary containment area pdficon_small.gif

560KB

Review by Orica's consultants, URS, 1 November, 2006 pdficon_small.gif

1.6MB

 

Groundwater Modelling / Monitoring Review:
  • Review the assumptions in the groundwater model
  • Comment on how groundwater extraction for the cleanup project will impact on the Botany Aquifer
  • Comment on the adequacy of monitoring locations between the Secondary Containment Area (SCA) and Penrhyn Estuary

Date

28/8/06

Author

Prof Acworth

Reports

Groundwater model review pdficon_small.gif

87KB

Botany Aquifer Levels in 1942 pdficon_small.gif 77KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1969 pdficon_small.gif 76KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1979 pdficon_small.gif 74KB
Botany Aquifer Levels in 1986 pdficon_small.gif 69KB

 

Saline Intrusion:

  • Potential for salt water intrusion at the Secondary Containment Line (SCL)
  • Comment on how the SCL has been designed and operated to minimise salt water intrusion 

Date

29/8/06

Author

Prof Acworth

Reports

Potential salt water intrusion pdficon_small.gif

142KB

 

Dioxin and Human Risk

Dioxin Monitoring:

  • Types of dioxins that have been detected in emissions from the Groundwater Treatment Plant (GTP) stack
  • Level of accuracy for the dioxin sampling and analysis
  • Reason behind the long-time cap for dioxin monitoring results to be available 
  • Recommendations to improve the monitoring of dioxins or surrogates (such as temperature) at the GTP
  • Advice on how sampling and analysis can be undertaken by the various labs in order to provide the community with confidence in the results in the long-term

Date

4/6/06

Author

Dr Clunies-Ross

Reports

Dioxin monitoring pdficon_small.gif

53KB

 

Human Health Risks:
  A paper on independent perspective on the incremental health risks associated with the reported dioxin emissions from the GTP compared with other potential dioxin sources in the local Botany community

Date

26/10/06

Author

Prof Priestly

Reports

Dioxin toxicity summary pdficon_small.gif

40KB

 

Dioxins and Human Health Risks:

  A paper on the ground level concentrations of dioxins that would result from the concentrations detected at the GTP stack and the resulting human health risk. It includes comments on how ground level concentrations and health risks would vary at distances from the GTP site.

Date

30/8/06

Authors

Prof Priestly and Dr Hibberd

Reports

Dioxin & human health pdficon_small.gif

88KB

 Last updated: Tue Jun 22 13:33:57 2010
Home | Interpretation | Glossary | Useful Links | Contact Us
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | © Copyright Orica Ltd